Related for Bava Batra 285:8

אחיות הוא דאין מקודשות הא נכריות מקודשות ואמאי את וחמור היא

[From this it follows that] only the sisters were not consecrated. but the strangers were consecrated;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Kid. 50b. ');">²¹</span> but why? This [is surely the same case as] 'You and the ass'!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As here the betrothal of the strangers is valid though that of the sisters is not, so in the case of possession given to a man and an ass, the man should acquire ownership though the ass does not. The two cases are parallel, since in the one case the betrothal was simultaneous and in the other possession was given simultaneously. How, then, in view of the decision of the Sages in the case of the women. could it he held that in the case of the man and the ass the man does not acquire ownership? ');">²²</span> — He said unto him: This is indeed [the reason] why I saw R. Huna b. Iwya in [my] dream: Because R. Iwya raised the objection. Have we not [however]. explained [the Mishnah<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Declaring valid the betrothal in the case of the strangers. ');">²³</span>

Explore related for Bava Batra 285:8. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.